FRR Jan 2010 — Pedophilia and Male Homosexuality

‘Pedophilia’ and Male Homosexuality

Homosexuals have claimed for some time that they are no more apt than heterosexuals to molest children. Over the past three decades, professional associations have chimed in to support their claim. For instance, in Romer v. Evans, a 1994 brief by the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, and the American Psychiatric Association told the U.S. Supreme Court “there is no evidence of any positive correlation between homosexual orientation and child molestation” (pp. 23, 24). The same claims are made in most college textbooks. In fact, this position is so ingrained that two expert witnesses for State Attorney Generals’ offices told me they were banned from addressing disproportionate molestation when defending Arkansas regulations against foster parenting by homosexuals (decided June 29, 2006) and Florida’s defense of its law against homosexual adoption (decided November 25, 2008).

The state of knowledge was historically very different. In pre-Christian Greece, Aristophanes observed that men taken with homosexual relations “when they grow to be men, they become lovers of boys, and it requires the compulsion of convention to overcome their natural disinclination to marriage and procreation.” More recently, a 1970s survey conducted by the Kinsey Institute reported that while aged 21 or older, 23% of 671 gays said they had sex with boys aged 16 or younger. And of 4,329 gays sampled by Jay and Young — both open homosexuals — about 22% reported sex with boys and over 30% openness to, or approval of, sex with boys.

Despite this evidence, Scotland has decided to protect homosexual practitioners in a very significant way. Recent events in Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Dundee ought to jolt Scots into rethinking those protections.

May of 2009 saw the prosecution of 8 Scottish male homosexuals, the arrest of another 35+ homosexuals across the UK, and still more arrests of others in the Netherlands and the U.S. for mixtures of child abuse and pornography. The 8 “gang members, all seemingly respectable professionals, led sordid double lives,” newspapers complained. [Why should the media expect education or professionalism to somehow shield one from becoming a child molester?]

The ringleaders were Neil Strachan, 41 (infected with HIV) and James Rennie, 38. Although “seemingly respectable professionals,” Strachan had already been convicted of raping a 5 year-old boy in 1997. Well, one might say, ‘he deserves a second-chance.’ Yet he was convicted of raping another 18 month-old boy in 2003. How many chances does a rapist get in Scotland? Plenty, since his latest victim was another 18 month-old boy.

Strachan charmed-up the parents, and then volunteered to babysit the little guy. Of course he was charming, attentive, and said all the right things — monsters such as he have the game down pat.

Do his three assaults on boys mean that Strachan is a ‘pedophile’ with no desire for adult partners? No. Strachan was infected with HIV and had a ‘gay partner’ (also indicted). He almost certainly got infected with HIV by having anal sex with another man, so his ‘pedophilia’ was far from an exclusive appetite. Like most homosexuals, these 8 individuals were sexually ‘flexible’ or ‘omnisexual.’

Rennie was a ‘gay star.’ A Scottish newspaper called him “the outwardly respectable boss of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Youth Scotland” (notice how far the Scots have fallen). As a secondary school teacher who had been invited to the Scottish Parliament for a debate on “helping young gay people,” his gay-rights activism was well known. His crime? Abusing a three-month old boy and permitting other members of the ‘gay clan’ to listen over the phone while he molested the tyke. Pictures, of course, were taken, and distributed far and wide. He too had a gay “partner,” trolled the Internet for gay sex dates, picked up “rent boys” [young male prostitutes], and “advertised a porn collection on toilet walls.” Yet another sexually obsessed ‘flexible fellow.’

Forgetting he had images of boys being molested on his hard-drive, the investigation started when Strachan took his laptop to get fixed. The repair shop noticed the 7,000+ pictures of naked and abused boys, etc. and notified police. The hard-drive turned up email lists of over 70 co-conspirators across the world. Police called it “the biggest and most challenging… paedophile network dismantled in Scotland.” A Netherlands comrade even bragged of having molested and ‘snuffed’ [killed] a little boy in France.

Rennie had exotic tastes. One of his emails indicated his longing to “see children with Down’s Syndrome sexually abused.” Sophisticated chap, eh?

All these perpetrators were “gay,” most were professionals. And the “church goer” who “helped with a kids’ after-school club” was married (but he also secretly had a gay partner, and used his wife’s email address to lure boys for sex).

Scotland has laws giving gays ‘super rights’ — they can’t even be criticized in letters to the editor. Clearly, giving super rights to the depraved results in super depravity.

How does a sexual taste for little boys come about?

A partial answer comes from South Africa’s Sunday Times (12/27/09). Seems “14 boys who live in a street in a working-class suburb of Cape Town” were caught having sex. “The children, aged between six and 13, have been… sodomising each other for months — allegedly after they watched a pornographic film together. A shocked parent told the Sunday Times that the case had come to light two weeks ago, when an eight-year-old was caught naked in bed with his three-year-old niece.

“He told (his father) that two of his friends, a nine-year-old and a 12-year-old, had sodomised him,” the parent said. The father took the boy to a doctor, who confirmed this. He then confronted the two alleged perpetrators, who said “they had been sodomised by another boy. The boys told us they had watched blue movies at the house of one of the older boys while his parents were at work,” another parent said. “The older boy then told ‘a group of about eight boys’ to ‘do what those people in the movie did.’ This started in September 2008, when the youngest was only five and the eldest 11” [by the way, this is fairly standard operating procedure — older boys induce younger boys to perform].

Notice what we have here: the boys ‘just happened’ to run across porn in one of their parents’ homes. Whether the pornography featured anal sex is hard to tell, but probably so. Kids, especially boys are curious. They know that adults do all kinds of ‘interesting’ and ‘fun’ things kids aren’t supposed to know about or do. This ‘sex ring’ ran for about a year before one of the parents stumbled upon it. Unfortunately, many of these boys are by now probably ‘into’ homosexual anal sex. No matter what their parents do or do not do to them, some of these boys will continue to sneak around and have homosexual sex. They ‘had fun’ and got away with it for a year — and getting away with something is yet another ‘coup’ on the parents.

Are they too young to ‘get hooked?’ No. Because of some parents’ purchases (or carelessness), all these boys are well-primed for an adult homosexual’s attentions while they are young. And homosexuals like the child-molesting Scots above make sure they are around kids whenever possible. When they reach their teens, who knows what these boys will do? Now that they have been ‘broken in,’ the trail of tears is just beginning — for them and their parents.

Which brings us to the UK Gay News (Warsaw, January 1, 2010). It scolded UK Tory leader Cameron’s new European Parliamentary allies, the Polish Law and Justice Party. What terrible thing is this Polish party doing? Why, “targeting gays as they demand a government clampdown on paedophiles and the Internet.”

This, the homosexuals assert, is “homophobia.”

Turns out that 27 Law and Justice Members of Parliament (MP) have signed a parliamentary question demanding the setting-up of a special department at the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, the Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita reported. “The team would monitor homosexual websites because we are dealing with the promotion of ‘paedophilia’ by some homosexual circles,” said MP Stanislaw Pieta, author of the parliamentary question. In addition, the MPs are demanding that the Ministry disclose statistics on the number of cases of paedophilia uncovered over the past ten years — and detailing cases that were homosexual. Mr. Pieta: “I am not saying that every gay is a paedophile, but let us consider Great Britain where from 20 to 43 percent of uncovered cases of paedophilia are homosexual instances, while gays make only 1% of society,” he said.

The MPs who signed the parliamentary question also want to know if police are given training in finding paedophiles among gays — and if police undertake ‘reconnaissance’ operations to monitor clubs frequented by gays. The MPs cite a Rzeczpospolita article in which gay activist Karski explained how a homosexual can evade the law and adopt a child. He “has pointed out a legal loophole which enables a crime to be committed,” MP Kozak told the newspaper.”

When I toured Poland in early 2009, I shared some of the extensive research that shows that gays are much more apt to molest children. I challenged Polish authorities to assemble their own data on child molestation. I also noted research documenting that homosexuals are more apt to engage in criminal pursuits. Homosexuals often feel that they are justified in breaking the law because they are ‘discriminated against’ and further justified in assaulting children because they were often assaulted (often they want to share the ‘fun’).

As you can see, criminality and homosexual tastes just seem to ‘go together’ — even in Poland. The Scottish experience shows that vile molestations, child pornography, and homosexuality go together. Let us hope the Poles can keep similar situations from occurring in their country. Gathering hard, empirical data is the first step.